ArticleMedical science educator2026
Mixed-Method Evaluation of the Impact of a "Healthcare Exploration Through Patient Care" Course on Undergraduate Students.
Article in Medical science educator, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Students in undergraduate degree programs often do not gain exposure to clinical work until late in their studies or even after graduation. The Healthcare Explorers (HCE) program provides an introduction to healthcare careers via a course series that combines seminar speakers and paid internships for students as patient care assistants. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the gateway course in the HCE series using student feedback and reflection data. Methods: Mixed-method data were collected from students through feedback surveys and written reflection assignments. Descriptive statistical analyses described frequencies for the quantitative survey items. Inductive qualitative analyses identified themes that describe the impact of the course over time on students' perceptions, understanding, and decisions regarding future careers in healthcare, as well as areas of program improvement. Results: Quantitative results demonstrated consistently high satisfaction throughout the semester and between semesters. Several themes characterized students' self-reflexivity in the written reflection data: feelings of inspiration and relief, consideration of personal and professional goals, self-confidence in skills and character, awareness of career options, and key lessons learned. Discussion: Introducing students to patient care, clinical team roles, and career options early in their education prepares them to pursue the training and work experiences they need to achieve their individual goals. Formal programming such as the HCE program that combines a supportive course framework with a clinical internship provides students with critical experiences that encourage self-reflection and informed decision-making. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-025-02545-y.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.