ArticleInternational journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP
Exploring the acceptability and feasibility of implementing VR relaxation in naturalistic settings.
Article in International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stress increased markedly in recent years, highlighting the need for effective and accessible relaxation strategies. Virtual Reality (VR) has emerged as a promising intervention. While most prior VR studies were conducted under controlled conditions, the present study explored the acceptability and feasibility of VR as a relaxation tool in naturalistic settings. Additionally, it explored the effects on the perceived level of relaxation and mood, and whether heart rate (HR) data obtained from consumer-grade wearables correlated with changes in psychological state. The study involved 160 participants, including healthcare and research professionals, patients, and attendants in healthcare organizations. VR relaxation was tested using both smartphone-based and standalone VR applications in clinical and non-clinical studies. Changes in mood and relaxation were explored using validated instruments, while acceptability and feasibility were assessed through open-ended questions. Qualitative feedback was predominantly positive, with participants willing to reuse and recommend the VR application. VR relaxation was perceived as an effective means of environmental escape, offering immersive natural settings complemented by guided exercises, ambient sounds, and voice instructions. Wearable devices generally recorded HR reductions during VR sessions; however, these exploratory physiological changes did not significantly correlate with subjective relaxation levels. Participants reported increased relaxation (VAS scores), reduced muscle tension, fewer cardiovascular symptoms of stress (slower breathing and HR), and greater overall physical calmness. Regarding mood, most participants experienced fewer negative emotions (e.g., anxiety, guilt, sadness) following VR exposure, although positive affect (e.g., enthusiasm, confidence) remained unchanged according to PANAS. POMS scores indicated reductions in tension after VR sessions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.