ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Conceptions of child development, assessment, and health among indigenous families in primary care: a qualitative study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This exploratory qualitative study examines Indigenous conceptions of child development, health, and developmental assessment from the perspectives of Mapuche, Aymara, and Diaguita families, together with primary health care professionals who provide care to Indigenous children in Chile. Methods: A qualitative study grounded in a constructivist paradigm was conducted using a rapid assessment approach. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with Indigenous families of children under nine years of age and with primary health care professionals working in urban and rural territories. Data were analyzed through thematic analysis, incorporating investigator triangulation and member checking to strengthen analytic rigor. Results: Indigenous families conceptualized child development as a relational, community-based, and holistic process, closely connected to territory, family networks, and cultural practices. Traditional medicine and home-based care were commonly used as first responses to childhood illness, while formal health services were sought primarily for more severe conditions. Both families and health professionals identified tensions with the biomedical model guiding primary health care, including culturally misaligned developmental assessment tools, limited intercultural competencies among professionals, and insufficient recognition of Indigenous identity within routine child health supervision. Conclusion: The findings reveal structural mismatches between standardized child health programs and Indigenous worldviews, with implications for equity, cultural safety, and the organization of primary health care. Addressing inequities in Indigenous child health requires care models that recognize cultural diversity, plural health knowledge systems, and community-based conceptions of child development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.