Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41938946›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Digital EduHealth for the wellbeing of minority university students: a scoping review.

Jessidenes Teixeira de Freitas Mendes Leal, Sara Dias-Trindade, Joilda Silva Nery, Júlio César Leal Pereira, Márcio Santos da Natividade, Rita Carvalho-Sauer, Renata Meira Veras, Ramon da Costa Saavedra, Clarice Santos Mota

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jessidenes Teixeira de Freitas Mendes LealInstituto de Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
Sara Dias-TrindadeCentro de Investigação Transdisciplinar "Cultura, Espaço e Memória" (CITCEM), Faculdade de Letras, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Joilda Silva NeryInstituto de Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
Júlio César Leal PereiraFlorida University of Science and Theology, Pompano Beach, FL, United States.
Márcio Santos da NatividadeInstituto de Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
Rita Carvalho-SauerInstituto de Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
Renata Meira VerasInstituto de Humanidades, Artes e Ciências, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
Ramon da Costa SaavedraInstituto de Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
Clarice Santos MotaInstituto de Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, BA, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Inequalities in mental health persist in higher education, disproportionately affecting students from social minorities, despite the progress made by affirmative action policies. Methods: This scoping review follows the Arksey and O'Malley framework, as refined by Levac and colleagues, and the recommendations of the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis for scoping reviews. It includes 55 articles from journals on digital interventions that integrate health and education, focusing on the well-being of university students belonging to minority social groups. This scoping review protocol has been registered with Open Science Framework and can be accessed at https://osf.io/yu76c/?view_only=91260110a2d5410f92731ff29a0eff71. Results: The results revealed the positive effects of digital interventions, especially those with culturally sensitive approaches. However, barriers such as digital exclusion, institutional racism, and poor infrastructure continue to compromise adherence, effectiveness, and inclusion. Discussion: While Digital EduHealth promotes emotional well-being and academic belonging, its success relies on cultural sensitivity, continuous support, and intersectional approaches. Overcoming barriers requires intersectoral strategies. Ultimately, integrating digital health and education provides an emancipatory tool to advance equity and university retention, complementing human contact. Systematic review registration: https://osf.io/yu76c?view_only=91260110a2d5410f92731ff29a0eff71.

Indexed as

Mental HealthMinority GroupsStudentsTelemedicineDigital HealthDigital MediaHumansUniversitiesDigital EduHealthdigital healthhealth equityhigher educationmental healthminority studentsscoping review

Identifiers

PMID41938946
PMCPMC13048269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.