ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Digital EduHealth for the wellbeing of minority university students: a scoping review.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Inequalities in mental health persist in higher education, disproportionately affecting students from social minorities, despite the progress made by affirmative action policies. Methods: This scoping review follows the Arksey and O'Malley framework, as refined by Levac and colleagues, and the recommendations of the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis for scoping reviews. It includes 55 articles from journals on digital interventions that integrate health and education, focusing on the well-being of university students belonging to minority social groups. This scoping review protocol has been registered with Open Science Framework and can be accessed at https://osf.io/yu76c/?view_only=91260110a2d5410f92731ff29a0eff71. Results: The results revealed the positive effects of digital interventions, especially those with culturally sensitive approaches. However, barriers such as digital exclusion, institutional racism, and poor infrastructure continue to compromise adherence, effectiveness, and inclusion. Discussion: While Digital EduHealth promotes emotional well-being and academic belonging, its success relies on cultural sensitivity, continuous support, and intersectional approaches. Overcoming barriers requires intersectoral strategies. Ultimately, integrating digital health and education provides an emancipatory tool to advance equity and university retention, complementing human contact. Systematic review registration: https://osf.io/yu76c?view_only=91260110a2d5410f92731ff29a0eff71.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.