ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Assessment of quality and reliability of Chinese-language myocardial infarction content on Bilibili and TikTok: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quality, content, and engagement of pulmonary tuberculosis related videos on Douyin: a cross-sectional study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- A cross-sectional study assessing the reliability and quality of educational videos on hydrocephalus available on TikTok and Bilibili.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The reliability and quality of short videos as a source of dietary guidance for cardiovascular disease: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Myocardial infarction (MI) is a leading cause of cardiovascular mortality worldwide and requires timely treatment and accurate public awareness of risk factors, warning signs, and first aid. In China, short-video platforms such as TikTok (Douyin, Chinese mainland version) and Bilibili have become major health information sources, yet the quality and reliability of MI-related content remain inadequately evaluated. Objective: This cross-sectional study systematically assessed and compared the quality, reliability, and educational value of MI-related videos on TikTok and Bilibili. Methods: Using the keyword "" (myocardial infarction), we retrieved the top 100 videos from TikTok and Bilibili on September 1, 2025. After exclusions, 137 videos were included. Uploaders were classified as clinicians, patients, or traditional Chinese medicine practitioners. Quality was evaluated using GQS, mDISCERN, JAMA benchmarks, and PEMAT-U/A. Statistical analyses included Spearman correlation, Mann-Whitney Results: Bilibili videos were significantly longer but had much lower engagement than TikTok videos. Only mDISCERN scores differed significantly between platforms: Bilibili contained a higher proportion of high-reliability videos than TikTok, while JAMA, GQS, and PEMAT-U/A scores did not differ significantly. Uploader background significantly influenced quality outcomes. Clinicians and TCM practitioners achieved higher JAMA scores than patients, indicating greater formal credibility, whereas patients had a higher proportion of high mDISCERN scores, reflecting more detailed experiential content. Correlation analysis revealed a bidirectional effect of video length: longer duration was positively associated with mDISCERN and GQS scores but negatively associated with JAMA scores. Interaction metrics showed strong internal synergy but almost no correlation with professional quality scores, demonstrating a clear "quality popularity paradox."Content analysis showed an imbalanced pattern: particularly regarding emergency measures and medication safety information were severely lacking. Conclusion: MI-related content on Chinese short-video platforms is of moderate quality but characterized by a significant disconnect between popularity and educational value, as well as critical deficiencies in emergency response information. These findings underscore the urgent need for coordinated interventions, including platform-level quality control, collaborative content creation between professionals and platform, and enhanced public health literacy to ensure the safe and effective use of these platforms for health education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.