ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Understanding intergenerational interactions and programs in Singapore: a comparative analysis of young adults and older adults' perspectives.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: As the population rapidly ages, older adults are faced with a multitude of physical, psychological, and social challenges that limit their ability to age well. Intergenerational programs have gained traction as a potential solution to address social isolation and loneliness among older adults, while also improving intergenerational solidarity among young adults. The study aimed to explore and compare the experiences, facilitators, and barriers to intergenerational relationships and participation in intergenerational programs, from the perspectives of young and older adults in Singapore. Methods: A qualitative descriptive approach with semi-structured interviews was conducted with 14 young adults and 15 older adults via purposive sampling. Data were analyzed thematically using inductive coding. Results: Three themes emerged: (1) intergenerational perceptions and attitudes towards intergenerational interactions; (2) language, interpersonal traits, and responsibility to bridge the intergenerational gap as facilitators and barriers towards intergenerational relationships; and (3) the role and impact of intergenerational programs on intergenerational relationships. Conclusion: This study highlighted the complex interplay of interpersonal, structural, and cultural factors that shape intergenerational relationships and the effectiveness of intergenerational programs in Singapore. To foster authentic and reciprocal intergenerational relationships, intergenerational programs must be intentionally designed to promote equal status, cooperation, and culturally sensitive practices that reflect the lived realities of both young adults and older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.