ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2026
An Anatomical Study to Ensure Precise Percutaneous Release of the Annular Pulley in the Trigger Finger.
Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The exact cause of trigger finger remains unknown; however, symptoms suggest that it occurs when the tendon becomes inflamed or thickened, leading to entrapment within the A1 pulley of the metacarpophalangeal joint. This study aims to establish an anatomical foundation for achieving successful outcomes in percutaneous A1 pulley release procedures. Methods: Specifically, easily identifiable skin creases were used as reference points to locate the A1 and A2 pulleys during surgery. A total of 156 fingers from 39 Korean adult cadavers were examined. Before dissection, surface landmarks such as the palmar crease (PC) and palmar digital crease (PDC) were identified, and the distances between nearby creases were measured. Following meticulous dissection, 9 distances, including the lengths of the A1 and A2 pulleys and the distance between the pulley edge and nearby crease, were recorded. Results: The results varied according to the fingers, with the A1 pulley averaging 7.2 mm (range, 6.9-7.4 mm) and the A2 pulley averaging 17.1 mm (range, 15.5-18.6 mm) in fingers 2 to 4. The gap between the A1 and A2 pulleys was relatively narrow (average, 3.4 mm). The A1 pulley was located distal to the PC in all cases. Additionally, the distance from the PC to the proximal margin of the A1 pulley averaged 4.2 mm (range, 3.1-4.9 mm). Furthermore, in some fingers, the entire A2 pulley was located proximal to the PDC, emphasizing anatomical variability. Conclusions: The findings of this study provide practical anatomical references for identifying the A1 and A2 pulleys using palmar skin creases, which may improve the safety and precision of percutaneous A1 pulley release while minimizing the risk of A2 pulley injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.