ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2026
Type III Sugaya Classification after Rotator Cuff Repair: Preoperative Risk Factors and Progression to Retear.
Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Letter to the Editor regarding "Comparable clinical outcomes despite high re-tear rates: arthroscopic versus mini-open repair in small- to medium-sized rotator cuff tears".European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026Article
- Comparable clinical outcomes despite high re-tear rates: arthroscopic versus mini-open repair in small- to medium-sized rotator cuff tears.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Backgroud: The Sugaya classification is a widely used classification system to assess rotator cuff tendon integrity after repair. However, Sugaya type III has received less attention in the literature compared to types I/II or IV/V. Existing data on preoperative risk factors and long-term outcomes are limited, and for Sugaya type III, there remains inconsistency regarding whether it should be classified as a healed or retorn tendon. The purpose of this study was to evaluate preoperative risk factors for the development of Sugaya type III and its longitudinal outcomes after rotator cuff repair. We hypothesized that it would be associated with preoperative tear severity and have a higher risk of developing a retear compared to Sugaya types I/II. Methods: This retrospective study consisted of 124 consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs involving the supraspinatus/infraspinatus and/or subscapularis tendon. Repair integrity was examined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) according to the Sugaya classification at 6 months postoperatively and ultrasound (US) imaging at the final follow-up. We compared preoperative demographic data, clinical scores, and US results for Sugaya types I/II and type III. Results: The mean follow-up period was 28 months (range, 12-73 months). Based on MRIs at 6 months postoperatively, there were 76 (61%) Sugaya type I/II, 33 (27%) type III, and 15 (12%) type IV/V. On the final US evaluation, 5 patients with type I, II, or III had a newly developed retear, including 1 of 76 Sugaya type I/II patients (1.3%) and 4 of 33 Sugaya type III patients (12.1%). This difference in the late development of a retear between the early Sugaya type I/II and type III groups was statistically significant ( Conclusions: Postoperative Sugaya type III repair status is associated with preoperative inferior muscle quality of the infraspinatus and can progress to a retear with a higher risk than Sugaya type I/II.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.