ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2026
Different Risk Factors of Rod Fracture between L5-S1 and ≥ L4-5 Levels in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.
Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Given the different biomechanical properties and surgical techniques between L5-S1 and at ≥ L4-5 levels, different factors might contribute to rod fracture (RF) development between the L5-S1 and ≥ L4-5 levels. Recognizing segment-specific risk factors can be helpful when planning surgery. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the risk factors for RF separately for L5-S1 and ≥ L4-5 levels after adult spinal deformity surgery. Methods: This study analyzed consecutive patients who underwent ≥ 5-level fusion including the sacrum or pelvis and were followed up for ≥ 2 years. RF was assessed at the segment level between the L1-2 and L5-S1 levels. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors for RF separately for L5-S1 and ≥ L4-5 levels. Results: A total of 318 patients were included in the study (mean age, 69.3 years; female, 88.4%; mean fusion length, 7.3 levels). A total of 1,329 segments were evaluated (247 for L5-S1 and 1,082 for ≥ L4-5 levels). The mean follow-up duration was 47.4 months. Multivariate analysis revealed that increased fusion length (odds ratio [OR], 1.251; Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the risk factors for RF are different between L5-S1 and ≥ L4-5 levels. Increased fusion length and poor postoperative correction of PT were significant risk factors for RF at the L5-S1 level, while non-use of teriparatide, ACR, and PF, performance of PSO, and dual rod construct significantly increased the risk of RF at ≥ L4-5 levels. Understanding the differing risk factors can help establish suitable preventive strategies tailored to each patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.