SynthesisClinics in orthopedic surgery2026
Complication Analysis of Conversion Hip Arthroplasty after Failed Intertrochanteric Fracture Fixation: A Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although internal fixation (IF) techniques for intertrochanteric fractures have continuously advanced, the failure rate remains around 5%, often requiring secondary surgical intervention. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of conversion hip arthroplasty (CHA) following IF failure in intertrochanteric fracture patients. Methods: A total of 1,468 hips with CHA for failed IF of intertrochanteric fracture from 25 studies were included. The primary outcome was complication rate, including loosening, infection, dislocation, and periprosthetic fractures. The secondary outcomes were functional outcome measured by Harris Hip Score (HHS), operation time, and perioperative blood loss. A proportion meta-analysis using a random-effects model was performed to estimate the complications. Results: The mean follow-up period of the included studies was 51.08 months. The overall complication rate was 17%. Among specific complications, the loosening and infection rates were both 3%, while the dislocation rate was 5%. The pooled incidence of periprosthetic fractures including intraoperative and postoperative fractures was 9%. The mean HHS was 84.19. The mean operation time was 150.24 minutes, and the mean perioperative blood loss was 918.39 mL. Conclusions: CHA demonstrates an overall complication rate of 17%, which is slightly higher than that of primary hip arthroplasty, mainly reflecting the elevated risks of periprosthetic fractures and dislocation. Despite these concerns, CHA yields favorable functional recovery and represents an effective salvage strategy following failed IF, thereby supporting its continued role in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.