Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41938877›Full record

ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2026

Radiological Analysis of Bone Regeneration in Different Tibial Distraction Osteogenesis Zones and Parts.

Yang Zhang, Fanyu Bu, Min Cao, Shihao Du, Ying Yang, Xueming Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yang ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Wuxi Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Wuxi, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9526-803X
Fanyu BuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Wuxi Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Wuxi, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8666-8075
Min CaoDepartment of Radiology, Wuxi Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Wuxi, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5236-9756
Shihao DuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Wuxi Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Wuxi, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1333-539X
Ying YangDepartment of Radiology, Wuxi Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Wuxi, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4156-4734
Xueming ChenDepartment of Orthopaedics, Wuxi Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Wuxi, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7505-063X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to explore whether asymmetrical bone regeneration is present in tibial distraction osteogenesis (DO) and analyze its etiologies. Methods: In total, 56 patients with tibial bone defects treated with DO were retrospectively analyzed (38 men and 18 women; average age, 47.3 years). Single proximal DO was conducted for 30 patients, single distal DO was conducted for 16 patients, and both proximal and distal DO were conducted for 10 patients. Bone regeneration, notably the healing time of the proximal and distal zones and different DO parts, was analyzed via radiological examination, and the possible etiologies were investigated. Results: There were 5 patients with poor regenerate formation (4 in the distal and 1 in the proximal), 3 patients with premature mineralization in the proximal, and 3 patients with DO zone fracture (1 in the proximal and 2 in the distal). The proximal healing time (11.8 ± 2.3 months) was shorter than the distal healing time (13.2 ± 2.5 months) ( Conclusions: Bone regeneration in different tibial DO zones and parts is asymmetrical, with faster regeneration in the proximal zone and posterior part and slower in the distal zone and anterior part, which may be due to differences in the local biological and external environments. These findings suggest that different distraction rates can be applied in different tibial regions, and more attention should be paid to protecting the anterior tibia.

Indexed as

Bone RegenerationOsteogenesis, DistractionTibiaAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiographyRetrospective StudiesTibial FracturesYoung AdultAsymmetryBone defectBone regenerationDistraction osteogenesisTibia

Identifiers

PMID41938877
PMCPMC13047404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.