ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2026
Clinical and Functional Outcomes Following Reverse Sural Flap of Lower Extremity Defects: A Comparative Retrospective Study.
Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The reverse sural artery flap (RSAF) is widely used for soft-tissue reconstruction of distal lower extremity defects. However, outcomes may vary based on the defect site. This study aimed to compare clinical, functional, and aesthetic outcomes of RSAF performed at the ankle, heel, and lower leg, and to identify predictors of postoperative complications. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 60 patients who underwent RSAF for soft-tissue reconstruction in the lower extremity. Patients were stratified by defect location: ankle, heel, or lower leg. Clinical data, complication rates, functional outcomes (Foot and Ankle Ability Measure [FAAM]), aesthetic outcomes (Vancouver Scar Scale), and predictors of complications were analyzed. Results: The heel group exhibited the highest complication rate (50%) compared to the ankle (33.3%) and lower leg (6.2%) ( Conclusions: While heel reconstructions demonstrated the highest raw complication rates and poorest functional outcomes, multivariable analysis suggests that patient factors-particularly smoking, obesity, and longer pedicle length-are stronger independent predictors of adverse outcomes than defect location itself. These findings underscore the importance of preoperative optimization and careful patient selection and highlight the need to interpret the influence of heel location with caution due to confounding factors such as the high prevalence of smoking in this subgroup.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.