ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Socioecological factors captured in autism service disparities research on Medicaid-enrolled patients: a rapid evidence review.
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There continue to be disparities in access to quality services that vary from the individual to the policy level. Medicaid is particularly relevant to accessing autism services, since obtaining a diagnosis often confers eligibility, regardless of income requirements, making it a major insurer in this population. Therefore, studies using Medicaid claims data to examine autism service access and utilization may provide unique insights into the demographics being studied and the factors influencing service equity. This rapid evidence review followed the Cochrane Rapid Review Methods Group recommendations and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines to conduct a literature search across five databases (i.e., ERIC, SCOPUS, PubMed, CINAHL Plus, PsycINFO) to locate articles describing studies of autism services utilization conducted in the United States using Medicaid claims data. Studies had to use Medicaid claims, include an autistic population, be peer-reviewed, original empirical research, and examine variances or disparities in autism services. Case studies or series were excluded. Inclusion criteria were assessed using the Covidence review management tool; 60 articles met all criteria and were included. Information was extracted regarding each study, including characteristics of the study and the included participants, including factors analyzed for variation in service utilization. Results show that existing autism disparities research primarily represents the experiences of school-aged children and young adults (ages 6-21 years), pharmacological and therapeutic services, and individual-level factors, limiting the generalizability of existing research on autism service use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.