ArticleStatistica Sinica2024
INTEGRATING INCOMPLETE DATA FOR MEDIATION ANALYSIS.
Article in Statistica Sinica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mediation analysis using incomplete information from publicly available data sources.Statistics in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mediation analysis examines the relationships between an exposure, a mediator, and an outcome. Although many approaches are available for performing such analyses they all require access to a single complete data set that contains the three key variables: outcome, exposure, and mediator. Here, we propose semiparametric methods for mediation analysis to estimate the standard causal parameters (direct and indirect effects) by combining information from several incomplete data sets, each containing only two of the three key variables. Importantly, our methods also handle scenarios in which only summary statistics based on those data sets are available. The resulting estimates of the causal parameters are asymptotically unbiased and normally distributed. We evaluate the performance of our methods in finite samples using simulations, and quantify the loss in efficiency from the lack of a complete data set with all three variables. We then apply proposed method to determine whether the number of terminal duct lobular units in the breast mediate the relationship between a polygenic risk score and breast cancer risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.