Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41938804›Full record

ArticleStatistica Sinica2024

INTEGRATING INCOMPLETE DATA FOR MEDIATION ANALYSIS.

Andriy Derkach, Joshua N Sampson, Ruth M Pfeiffer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistica Sinica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andriy DerkachDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, MSKCC, New York, NY 10017, USA.
Joshua N SampsonBiostatistics Branch, DCEG, NCI, NIH, Rockville, MD 20852, USA.
Ruth M PfeifferBiostatistics Branch, DCEG, NCI, NIH, Rockville, MD 20852, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mediation analysis examines the relationships between an exposure, a mediator, and an outcome. Although many approaches are available for performing such analyses they all require access to a single complete data set that contains the three key variables: outcome, exposure, and mediator. Here, we propose semiparametric methods for mediation analysis to estimate the standard causal parameters (direct and indirect effects) by combining information from several incomplete data sets, each containing only two of the three key variables. Importantly, our methods also handle scenarios in which only summary statistics based on those data sets are available. The resulting estimates of the causal parameters are asymptotically unbiased and normally distributed. We evaluate the performance of our methods in finite samples using simulations, and quantify the loss in efficiency from the lack of a complete data set with all three variables. We then apply proposed method to determine whether the number of terminal duct lobular units in the breast mediate the relationship between a polygenic risk score and breast cancer risk.

Indexed as

Data integrationdirect and indirect effectssemiparametric likelihoodsummary level information

Identifiers

PMID41938804
PMCPMC13048772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.