ArticleJournal of location based services2026
Semantically enriching personal mobility data using OpenStreetMap: a case study using smartphone users' frequently visited places.
Article in Journal of location based services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Behavioral scientists use geodatabases to automatically annotate mobile device location data with semantically meaningful point-of-interest (POI) labels. Using volunteered geographic information (VGI), such as OpenStreetMap (OSM) data, to annotate large amounts of location data is more cost-effective and efficient than manual annotation by participants. The data quality of VGI, however, has been questioned, with limited evidence supporting its use for annotating personal mobility data. We assessed the performance of using OSM POI data to annotate year-long smartphone location data acquired from 93 people in the United States. A Python package was developed to extract POI geometric and semantic information from the OSM geodatabase and annotate places frequently visited by participants. We evaluated the semantic annotation performance of our OSM package against participant-provided annotations and compared OSM with two popular commercial geodatabases: Foursquare and Google Maps. Annotations acquired using OSM data had the best overall performance across eight categories of places, with 81% of places labeled and an average F1 score of 0.65, although Foursquare and Google Maps showed advantages for annotating some categories. This case study provides empirical evidence supporting the use of OSM for semantic enrichment in mobile device location data research. We outline recommendations for future implementations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.