Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41938778›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026

Hygiene procedures of trucks transporting live pigs: multi-assessment validation of a standardized C&D protocol.

A Perrucci, A Magri, V Cardana, S Zoppi, C Cossettini, A Scollo

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A PerrucciDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
A MagriIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte Liguria e Valle d'Aosta, Turin, Italy.
V CardanaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
S ZoppiIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte Liguria e Valle d'Aosta, Turin, Italy.
C CossettiniChemifarma S.p.A., Forlì, Italy.
A ScolloDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inadequately cleaned transport vehicles can act as reservoirs for pathogens jeopardizing pigs' health status. Although effective cleaning and disinfection (C&D) of live-pig transport trucks is required by law, there is still no universally accepted protocol for C&D of trucks. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a standardized hygiene protocol under field conditions and to provide practical guidance, thereby fostering harmonized hygiene procedures. Starting from current legislation for barn C&D, and refining it through available literature, a detailed standardized protocol for truck hygiene was developed. Each vehicle was divided into three functional sections: transport unit, boot-storage compartment, and driver's cabin. The protocol was applied to 15 trial trucks transporting live pigs and compared with 23 market trucks, which served as controls. C&D was assessed through visual inspection, adenosine triphosphate (ATP) testing, and microbiological analyses of environmental samples, including total viable count (TVC) on all trucks. Samples were collected at the three functional sections of the trucks. Trial trucks achieved significantly higher visual scores than control trucks (82.10 ± 9.72 vs. 72.20 ± 7.48;

Indexed as

ATPbiosecuritycleaning and disinfectionMRSApractical recommendationstrucks

Identifiers

PMID41938778
PMCPMC13045574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.