ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026
Efficacy of a short-acting oral fluralaner formulation (WellPet™) against fleas and brown dog ticks in controlled and field conditions.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Fluralaner is an isoxazoline widely used for flea and tick control in dogs, mainly in long-acting formulations. However, the performance of short-acting, lower-dose options remains unexplored in scientific literature. This study evaluated the efficacy of a short-acting oral fluralaner formulation (WellPet™-Ourofino Saúde Animal Ltda, São Paulo, Brazil; 10-22.5 mg of fluralaner per kg of body weight) against Methods: A randomized, blinded, negative-controlled laboratory study assessed intrinsic efficacy using standardized artificial infestations over 49 days. A randomized, assessor-blinded positive-controlled field trial compared fluralaner with sarolaner in naturally infested dogs living in private households. Fleas and ticks were counted following WAAVP guidelines. Efficacy was calculated using arithmetic means, and statistical analyses were performed with Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon tests. All analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics 31.0. Results: In the controlled study, fluralaner produced a rapid reduction in parasite burdens, achieving 100% efficacy for fleas and ticks as early as Day +2. Efficacy remained between 98.3 and 100% for ticks and 99.7 and 100% for fleas throughout the entire period of evaluation. In the field trial ( Conclusion: This novel short-acting oral fluralaner formulation demonstrated rapid onset and sustained efficacy under experimental and real-world conditions, supporting its use as an effective option for flea and tick control in areas with high parasite pressure, with an unique periodicity of readministrations every 49 days.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.