ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026
Partial culling and HPAI control in poultry: insights from Lower Saxony, Germany.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) pose a significant threat to the poultry industry. Enormous numbers of poultry are destroyed annually, not only by the disease itself, but also related to the control measures. One way to reduce these losses could be to apply partial culling methods to holdings where population destruction is mandated. This case series presents three cases from Lower Saxony, Germany, from 2021 or 2023, in which partial culling initiatives were successfully implemented. The cases include a turkey rearing farm with coupled parent stock, a free-range goose pasture for breeding, and a turkey fattening farm. Throughout the individual risk assessment process, the possibility of partial culling was recognized in all three cases. These measures saved approximately 57,000 animals, enabling them to fulfill their original purpose or provide secondary benefits. However, it should be noted that there were also unforeseen consequences during or after the partial culling approach in each case. The successful application in the individual outbreaks demonstrates that partial culling can be a suitable approach in specific situations. However, very high biosecurity standards and other necessary precautions are required, as well as a specific risk assessment focusing specifically on this option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.