ArticleEthnicity & disease2025
Community-Academic Workshop on Translating Research Findings into Policy Briefs for Broader Dissemination.
Article in Ethnicity & disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: Health equity research often aims to promote policy, program, or system change; yet, findings are seldom translated or disseminated into lay and policy-relevant language for communities, practitioners, decision-makers, and policymakers. Policy briefs enable researchers to summarize and communicate their findings to policymakers and organizations, promoting policy, practice, and program change. Methods: To address the evidence-policy gap, which is the lack of translation from research findings to policy changes, the California Policy Lab and the UCLA Community Engagement and Research Program delivered a 2-hour interactive policy brief workshop to researchers, research staff, and community-based organizations. A community-government-academic-partnered research report was evaluated and reviewed as a case example, revising results and dissemination into a policy brief. Results: A diverse community, government, and academic turnout (N=215 participants) and postworkshop survey results demonstrate a broad interest in the topic and the pressing need for more training on translating research into policy impact, particularly within multisector partnerships working toward health equity, where multimedia dissemination is critical for translating results for timely policy, program, or practice impact. A workshop curriculum, handout, and recording are provided to promote similar training in other settings. Conclusion: To promote more effective evidence-based policy and practice linkages, researchers and partners need more training on policy-relevant research design and related dissemination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.