Observational studyEthnicity & disease2025
Cervical Cancer Screening among Older Latina Migrant and Seasonal Farmworkers in a Network of Community Health Centers.
Observational study in Ethnicity & disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Cervical cancer screening is effective; however, it is unclear whether older migrant and seasonal farmworker (MSFW) Latinas have equitable screening utilization. Methods: Retrospective observational study of electronic health record data to assess cervical cancer screening patterns (human papillomavirus [HPV]-only, Papanicolaou [Pap], or both) among 21,294 MSFW and non-MSFW Latinas aged 50-65 years with ≥1 face-to-face visit at 348 US community health centers (CHCs) in 17 states between 2012 and 2017. We conducted generalized estimating equation logistic regression, adjusting for demographics, health care use, and health status. Results: MSFW Latinas had higher rates of cervical cancer screening and HPV-only screening than non-MSFW Latinas (59% vs 49% and 49% vs 36%, respectively). MSWF Latinas, compared to non-MSFW Latinas, had higher odds of ever undergoing any type of cervical cancer screening (odds ratio [OR], 1.37; 95% CI, 1.16-1.61), a HPV-only screening (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.11-1.44), and a Pap smear (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.02-1.47). Conclusions: In CHCs, MSFW Latinas have higher odds of undergoing cervical cancer screening than non-MSFW Latinas. CHCs may play an important role in delivering cervical cancer screening among older MSFW Latinas. Further research is warranted to better understand the facilitators of care and differences in utilization between these populations. Impact: Given the increasing rates of overdue cervical cancer screening in the United States, resource investment in CHCs remains critical to help sustain and expand the capacity to serve the growing and aging Latina population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.