ArticleThe Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy2026
Antimicrobial Administration Delays for Patients with Suspected Sepsis in a Canadian Emergency Department: Prevalence and Risk Factors.
Article in The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: For patients with sepsis, timely administration of antimicrobials is imperative, with evidence demonstrating that delays may be associated with an increase in mortality. Objective: To determine whether antimicrobial administration is delayed among patients with sepsis admitted through the Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre Emergency Department (QEII-HSC-ED) in Halifax, Nova Scotia. Methods: A single-centre, retrospective health records review was conducted for adult patients with sepsis admitted through the QEII-HSC-ED between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2022. Differences between groups with and without antimicrobial administration delays were compared by univariate analysis, and an adjusted multivariate regression was completed to examine associations between risk factors and significant delays. Results: A total of 275 patient encounters were included in the analysis, accounting for a total of 1208 antimicrobial doses: 275 first doses and 933 subsequent doses. Of the 275 patient encounters, 216 (78.5%) had at least one significant dose delay; 135 (49.1%) of the encounters had delay of the first dose, and 169 (61.5%) had delay of a subsequent dose. Of the 933 subsequent doses administered, 276 (29.6%) had a significant delay. Relative to patients admitted to a medicine service, surgical patients had reduced odds of experiencing significant delay of a subsequent dose (odds ratio 0.25, 95% confidence interval 0.08-0.77). Conclusions: Many patients with sepsis admitted through the QEII-HSC-ED experienced significant delays in administration of first and/or subsequent doses of antimicrobial therapy, which may have increased their risk of negative outcomes. These results can be used to develop future initiatives aimed at improving time to administration of antimicrobials for patients with sepsis admitted to the study institution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.