ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Carry-over effect of learned distractor suppression on visual working memory.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent research has demonstrated that visual statistical learning guides attentional priority by proactively suppressing locations where distractors are more frequent. While there is evidence to suggest that both attention and working memory (WM) consume a common pool of cognitive resources, there is limited evidence on the nature of the interaction between the learned distractor suppression and WM. The present study investigated whether the learned spatial suppression of an external distractor has a carry-over effect that impairs the WM representation of objects encoded at that location. Across two experiments, participants first completed a visual search task designed to induce statistical learning. A salient singleton distractor appeared more frequently in a specific quadrant, while appearing less frequently in other locations. This was followed by a delayed discrimination task, in which participants had to encode and maintain target shapes presented at either the high-probability or low-probability distractor location. Experiment 1 imposed a low WM load (one target), while Experiment 2 imposed a high WM load (two targets). The results showed that the carry-over effect of suppression from a visual search task to a WM task was contingent on WM load. When the load was high, participants exhibited significantly reduced sensitivity (d') and a higher false alarm rate for targets presented at the high-probability distractor location. These findings suggest that statistical learning operates by down-regulating sensory gain at suppressed locations. This pattern supports a non-modular, shared resource account of attention and WM, suggesting that history-driven attentional biases can modulate the WM representations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.