ArticleInnovation in aging2026
Sources of inequality in "living well" with dementia: an intersectional analysis using a British cohort study.
Article in Innovation in aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: A key aim of national dementia policies is to enable people to "live well" with the condition, but the experience of living with dementia, including access to health and social care services, is markedly affected by numerous sources of socioeconomic disparity. We explored how combinations of these disparities among groups of people with dementia are associated with the capability to "live well." Research Design and Methods: We used baseline data from 1,537 people with mild-to-moderate dementia in the British IDEAL cohort (2014-2016). This included personal characteristics, living situation, socioeconomic position, and geographical area, and 3 indices of "living well"-quality of life, satisfaction with life, and well-being. Through regression-tree analyses, we explored how the intersection of factors beyond type of dementia and co-morbidity is associated with subgroups of people with dementia experiencing higher or lower capability for "living well." Results: Age, education, living situation, income, and home ownership emerged as the strongest differentiators. Drawing on the concept of precarity, we show how the connections between unequal distribution of resources and personal vulnerabilities lead to an accumulation of pressures and shape outcomes. Discussion and Implications: These findings from a cohort of people with dementia in a major Western economy represent the tip of the iceberg relative to the full extent of national and especially global inequalities. Addressing the impact of these social inequalities requires a sustained focus on developing and implementing policies that improve equity of access to care and support and increase the potential for "living well."
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.