ArticleThe World Allergy Organization journal2026
Indication for biologic treatment in a real-world cohort of chronic rhinosinusitis patients according to international recommendations: Evidence from the European CRS outcome registry (CHRINOSOR).
Article in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In recent years, treatment options for patients with uncontrolled severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) have been expanded with biologics. Definitions of uncontrolled severe disease differ across international recommendations and the prescription of biologics depends on national reimbursement criteria. Objective: We aimed to evaluate the indication for biologic treatment, based on international recommendations, in a real-world cohort of CRSwNP patients. Methods: CRS patients who visited the outpatient ENT clinic of 10 tertiary centres from 7 European countries were invited to use the Galenus Health mobile application monitoring their disease. The proportion of patients who fulfilled biologic indication criteria according to EUFOREA 2021 and EPOS/EUFOREA 2023 recommendations was evaluated. Results: A total of 281 CRS patients were recruited of which 227 (82.1%) were diagnosed as CRSwNP. Out of these 227 patients, 21 patients with prior biologic use were excluded, resulting in a cohort of 206 patients. A total of 28.7% (50/174) and 47.6% (81/170) of CRSwNP patients, met the EUFOREA 2021 or EPOS/EUFOREA 2023 criteria for indication for biologic treatment, respectively. Biologic treatment was initiated at the time of inclusion in the cohort in 18.9% (39/206) of CRSwNP patients. Conclusion: According to international recommendations, 29-48% of CRSwNP patients in tertiary centres may be a candidate for biologic treatment. EPOS/EUFOREA2023 criteria were more inclusive than EUFOREA 2021 criteria with respect to biologic indication for CRSwNP. National reimbursement criteria prevail over international recommendations for actual biologic prescription and are less restrictive in some countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.