ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
"Reimaging a triage system with midwives, for midwives": exploring preferences for a midwife-Led triage system in South Africa through a user-centered approach.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Triage in the maternity unit is critical to ensuring the delivery of timely and appropriate care. It is regarded as an initiative to reduce maternal mortality by accelerating the provision of appropriate care at the appropriate time. However, maternity units in South Africa lack standardized triage systems. Most pregnant women often wait for hours and days upon arriving at the hospital. This delay could prove costly for complicated pregnancies and childbirth. Therefore, this paper aims to explore the preferences and needs of midwives for a midwife-led triage system in South Africa. Methods: A user-centered design approach underpinned this study, focusing on the requirement gathering stage to fully understand the needs and preferences of midwives for an ideal midwife-led triage system. A sequential exploratory research design within the user-centered design framework was used. Experienced midwives were selected to participate in the study. Semistructured interviews and surveys were used for data collection, which were then analyzed using thematic analysis and descriptive statistics. Results: The study found that midwives had different needs and preferences for an ideal digital system. Two principal themes emerged from data integration, namely, triage contents and features of the midwife-led triage system and the application and functionality features of the midwife-led triage system. The study underscored the importance of including clinical profiles, patient profiles, clinical histories, and the designated area for subjective data such as chief complaints. In addition, the midwives expressed the need for the digital triage system to share information and be linked to primary healthcare facilities and laboratories to access patient results. They also highlighted the need for the system to provide clinical management guidance by incorporating maternal guidelines, addressing concerns about poor skills and incompetence among some midwives. The study underscored that preferences of midwives are shaped by their experience and the existing environment. Conclusion: Therefore, this paper suggests that the preferences, needs, and ideas of midwives should be integrated into the digital triage application to create a new quality triage system for maternity units in South Africa. Furthermore, relevant stakeholders should provide the resources required to navigate a smooth triaging process of patients with the midwife-led system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.