ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
Decoding perceived risks in online healthcare services: a safety-trust model based on grounded theory.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The rapid rise of online healthcare services (OHSs) in China has improved access to medical information and services while creating new uncertainties related to quality, security, and trust. This study aims to deepen the understanding of perceived risk in OHSs and provide empirical guidance for digital health governance, patient safety strategies, and the development of trustworthy online medical platforms. Methods: Using a grounded theory approach, we analyzed 106,162 user-generated comments collected from four major online health forums to identify the multidimensional structure and temporal evolution of perceived risk in OHSs. Results: The analysis produced 22 categories consolidated into four domains: professional-medical, institutional-transactional, technical-data, and relational-emotional , which together constitute a perceived safety-trust model. The model explains how professional uncertainty triggers institutional anxiety, technological fragility heightens perceived vulnerability, and emotional detachment amplifies distrust. The salience of perceived risks shifted over time from professional concerns (2015-2018) to institutional and technical issues (2019-2022), and later to relational-emotional concerns (2023-2024). Discussion: These findings refine the mechanisms underlying perceived risk in OHSs and show that user trust depends on professional competence, technological reliability, institutional transparency, and empathetic communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.