ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
Anonymization, accountability, and access: legal dimensions of health data sharing in federated networks. Perspectives from empirical study.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper explores the perspectives of stakeholders involved in federated networks for health data sharing, focusing on the legal and practical dimensions of data protection and governance under GDPR and EHDS in the development of such infrastructures. Using a qualitative approach centered on perspectives of 19 experts with experience in projects building federated networks, it investigates the perceived challenges in fulfilling specific obligations under the GDPR, as well as in establishing the contractual framework of a federated network, including the arrangements and mechanisms required to control data access and to define the conditions for lawful and effective data sharing and reuse. The study critically assesses the commonly cited assurance that "data never leaves the node" and evaluates the compatibility of federated approaches with data protection requirements. It highlights key tensions between legal theory and practical implementation, offering insights relevant to the design and governance of other federated architectures and emerging European data spaces. Study results indicate that while the advantages of a federated approach, such as data minimization, should not be discarded, there are also significant challenges of aligning federated networks architectures with data protection requirements in particular. Federated networks help initiate discussions about data sharing with new data holders, but they do not offer a straightforward solution to legal and technical challenges of data sharing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.