ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
Extraction and processing of intensive care chart data from a patient data management system.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Routine clinical data captured in Patient Data Management Systems (PDMS) in intensive care and perioperative settings are an invaluable resource for clinical research. However, the proprietary, fragmented, and transaction-oriented architecture of many systems severely limits secondary data use and requires extensive Extract, Transform, and Load (ETL) processing. Methods: We developed a modular, Python-based ETL framework that enables flexible, domain-specific extraction of high-frequency, multimodal PDMS data. The system provides reusable components for data retrieval, preprocessing, harmonization, and de-identification, allowing extraction methods to be adapted or extended without modifying the core architecture. Each clinical domain is represented through dedicated Pydantic models enforcing consistent output schemas, type constraints, and automated plausibility checks. SQLAlchemy abstracts database access, while structured preprocessing logic resolves common documentation inconsistencies and transforms heterogeneous PDMS entries into standardized representations. Results: The framework produces reproducible, analysis-ready datasets through a transparent, auditable workflow. An integrated audit logger records extraction parameters, transformations, and derived fields, providing full traceability. Salted, irreversible pseudonymization is embedded directly into the pipeline, supporting compliance with the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR; German: Datenschutz-Grundverordnung, DSGVO) and Art. 27 of the Bayerisches Krankenhausgesetz (BayKrG). By encapsulating extraction logic in modular processing units with consistent validation and automated de-identification, the system replaces complex Conclusion: The presented framework overcomes substantial technical and regulatory barriers to the secondary use of PDMS data by operationalizing a governance-first extraction pipeline. Its modular architecture encapsulates site-specific PDMS queries in a bounded adapter layer, while keeping validation, pseudonymization, and audit logging portable and reusable across domains and installations. By embedding domain-level validation models, irreversible pseudonymization, and structured auditing, the framework enables reproducible, governance-compliant access to high-frequency intensive care data. Rather than requiring immediate alignment to a common data model, it provides a pragmatic foundation on which semantic and syntactic interoperability can be added incrementally as requirements and resources evolve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.