Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41938580›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026

Comparison of the mixed approach and medial approach in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right colon cancer: a retrospective study.

Mao-Xing Liu, Fei Tan, Shun-Yu Deng, Kechen Guo, Jia-Di Xing, Pin Gao, Kai Xu, Xiang-Qian Su

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mao-Xing Liu *Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Fei Tan *Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Shun-Yu Deng *Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Kechen GuoDepartment of Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jia-Di XingKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Pin GaoKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Kai XuKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Xiang-Qian SuKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery IV, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The study aimed to determine the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes of the mixed approach vs. the medial approach in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed clinical data from 290 patients who underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomies at our institution. Based on the surgical approach used, the patients were categorized into a medial approach group ( Results: No significant difference was found in the baseline data between the two groups. Moreover, the results showed no significant difference between the medial approach and mixed approach groups in both DFS [HR = 1.799, 95% CI (0.9673, 3.347), Conclusions: Across tumor stages, 3-year DFS and OS rates were similar between the two surgical approach groups. Thus, considering its safety and efficacy, the mixed approach may be a preferred alternative.

Indexed as

colon cancerdisease-free survivallaparoscopic surgeryoverall survivalsurgery approaches

Identifiers

PMID41938580
PMCPMC13047092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.