ArticleVeterinary world2026
Comparative gut microbiome composition and predicted microbial functions in captive and free-range yaks (
Article in Veterinary world, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: The gut microbiota is essential for nutrient digestion, immune function, and environmental adaptation in ruminants, particularly high-altitude species like yaks ( Materials and Methods: Fecal samples were collected from healthy ~2-year-old yaks (n=5 CY, n=5 FY) in Litang County, Ganzi Prefecture, Sichuan, China, during summer. DNA was extracted, and the V4 region of the Results: α-Diversity indices (e.g., Shannon p = 0.5476) showed no significant differences between CY and FY. However, β-diversity revealed distinct community structures (PCoA: PC1 30.52%, PC2 12.25%; ANOSIM R = 0.976, Conclusion: Husbandry practices profoundly influence yak gut microbiome structure and inferred metabolic potential, with free-range systems promoting, homogeneous communities suited to natural high-fiber diets while captive systems promotes fermentative and opportunistic shifts. These microbiome differences suggest opportunities for probiotic interventions to enhance yak health, productivity, and sustainability in high-altitude pastoral systems. Future metagenomic and metabolomic validation is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.