ArticleVeterinary world2026
Veterinarians' perspectives on animal welfare, legal enforcement, and forensic readiness in companion animal cruelty investigations in Thailand: A cross-sectional qualitative study.
Article in Veterinary world, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Animal cruelty is a persistent concern for animal welfare and society worldwide. In Thailand, the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals and Animal Welfare Act B.E. 2557 (2014) provides a legal framework to address animal abuse; however, effective enforcement remains constrained by limitations in investigative procedures and the limited integration of veterinary forensic science. Veterinarians from the Department of Livestock Development (DLD) play a central role in responding to cruelty reports, conducting inspections, and supporting legal processes. This study aimed to explore the attitudes of DLD veterinarians toward companion animal welfare, the effectiveness of existing animal welfare legislation, and the current and potential role of forensic science in animal cruelty investigations in Thailand. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional qualitative study was conducted between August 2024 and December 2024. Eighteen veterinarians with DLD from six geographic regions of Thailand were recruited using stratified purposive sampling. Data were collected via a validated, open-ended online questionnaire that addressed animal welfare challenges, legal enforcement, investigative procedures, and forensic applications. Qualitative content analysis was performed using the NVivo software, with double-blind coding to enhance analytical rigor. The codes were organized into categories and overarching themes following inductive thematic analysis. Results: Multiple interrelated drivers of companion animal cruelty were identified by veterinarians. The major welfare-related themes included a lack of owner responsibility and preparedness, insufficient knowledge and ethical awareness regarding animal care, socioeconomic constraints, deficiencies in stray animal management systems, weaknesses in law enforcement, and cultural attitudes that undermine animal welfare. While most respondents perceived the existing animal cruelty law as partially effective in reducing abuse, they highlighted critical gaps, including ambiguous legal definitions, inconsistent enforcement, and limited public awareness. The absence of standardized veterinary forensic protocols, limited forensic training, and restricted inspection authority were the primary factors driving investigative challenges. Respondents strongly supported the integration of forensic science, emphasizing its potential to improve evidentiary reliability, strengthen legal credibility, and enhance investigative outcomes, while also identifying the need for structured training programs and interagency collaboration. Conclusion: Companion animal cruelty in Thailand is driven by multifactorial welfare, legal, and societal challenges. Although current legislation provides a foundation for protection, the absence of standardized forensic practices limits investigative effectiveness. Strengthening veterinary forensic capacity through harmonized protocols, targeted training, and coordinated enforcement could substantially enhance animal welfare protection and support consistent application of animal cruelty legislation within a One Welfare framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.