Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41938494›Full record

ReviewNeurology. Genetics2026

Assessment and Treatment of Cutaneous Neurofibromas in Neurofibromatosis Type 1: A Scoping Review.

Hadiya Abdalla Elahmar, Carlos Alberto Soto Rincon, Aaron Drucker, Patricia Parkin, Carolina Barnett-Tapia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurology. Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hadiya Abdalla ElahmarInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4854-7542
Carlos Alberto Soto RinconElisabeth Raab Neurofibromatosis Clinic, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Ontario, Canada.
Aaron DruckerInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7388-9475
Patricia ParkinInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2935-7145
Carolina Barnett-TapiaInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5546-0221

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of Review: Cutaneous neurofibromas (cNFs) are a hallmark feature of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and are associated with substantial physical, psychosocial, and quality-of-life burden. Progress in therapeutic development is hindered by the absence of validated, feasible, and responsive tools for quantifying cNFs and assessing their clinical effect and treatment response. This scoping review aimed to identify and summarize existing methods used to measure and quantify cNFs, evaluate their effect on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and assess outcome measures used in cNF treatment studies. Recent Findings: A comprehensive search of 6 electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform) from inception to April 2025 identified 1,916 records, of which 61 articles met inclusion criteria (48 primary studies and 13 review articles). Eight studies evaluated instruments for cNF measurement, while 5 assessed HRQoL using patient-reported outcomes (PROs). A greater cNF burden, particularly an increased number, size, and facial involvement, was consistently associated with poorer HRQoL. Among identified PROs, the cNF-Skindex was the only tool specifically developed for cNFs. Twenty-three studies investigated therapeutic interventions, and 12 registered clinical trials evaluated medical or surgical treatments. Considerable heterogeneity was observed in outcome selection, with many studies lacking clearly defined end points or relying on nonvalidated or inconsistently applied measures. Summary: This scoping review highlights the availability of several methods to quantify cNFs; however, their clinical feasibility, responsiveness, and interpretability remain limited. Outcome measures used across cNF intervention studies are highly variable, impeding comparison across studies and synthesis of evidence. The cNF-Skindex represents a promising cNF-specific HRQoL instrument but requires further validation, including assessment of responsiveness and minimal important difference thresholds. Standardization of cNF measurement approaches and outcome selection is urgently needed to support robust clinical trials and enable meaningful evaluation of treatment efficacy in NF1.

Identifiers

PMID41938494
PMCPMC13045735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.