ArticleJournal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques2026
Transiliac bone tunnel route for lower limb vascular reconstruction.
Article in Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Drilling a safer path: Reconsidering the iliac wing as a reconstructive corridor.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Major oncovascular resections involving irradiated or infected groins often preclude standard in-line arterial or venous reconstruction because of hostile local conditions and high reinfection risk. In these complex scenarios, trans-iliac bone tunnel bypass (TIBB) represents an alternative extra-anatomic solution, providing a protected lateral route that avoids contaminated fields while ensuring durable limb perfusion or venous outflow. We describe the technical principles, perioperative management, and clinical applicability of TIBB through two representative cases. The first case involved an arterial reconstruction performed for groin blowout following neoadjuvant radiotherapy and multiple prior graft infections. The second case concerned venous reconstruction after en bloc pelvic oncovascular resection for leiomyosarcoma. The technique is based on retroperitoneal iliac exposure, creation of a 10-mm tunnel through the iliac wing, and lateral routing of a ring-reinforced polytetrafluoroethylene graft in a subcutaneous plane, distant from infected or irradiated tissues. In both cases, TIBB achieved satisfactory hemodynamic results, effective infection control, and durable patency. At mid-term follow-up, arterial reconstruction remained patent without reinfection, whereas venous bypass resulted in significant limb edema reduction and maintained graft patency. These experiences suggest that TIBB is a reproducible and effective limb-salvage strategy in selected oncovascular patients when conventional reconstructive options are unsafe or unfeasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.