ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026
Reconstructing manhood: a unique case report of a penile gunshot wound and its surgical management.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Penile injuries are a common finding in many traumatic presentations, but a penetrating gunshot wound (GSW) to the male external genitalia is a rare finding in the US. Traumatic penile injuries commonly present with pain, erythema, blood at the urethral meatus, and difficulty voiding. A proper diagnostic workup still makes it difficult to locate the site of injury. Appropriate and time-efficient management of penile injuries is important to minimize future complications such as erectile dysfunction, abnormal curvature, and difficulty voiding. Presentation of Case: In this case report, we present a rare, traumatic GSW to the penis in a 25-year-old male patient without significant medical history, along with the relevant diagnostic and operative management. CT angiography, Doppler ultrasound, and cystoscopy all played a crucial role in accurate diagnosis. This case represents the complex management of a patient with penetrating injuries to the penis, including penile exploration and repair of the corpora cavernosa. Clinical Discussion: GSWs to the penis are a rare but devastating traumatic injury. Accurate identification and assessment of injury extent are critical to preventing long-term genitourinary complications. The anatomical structures involved, including the urethra and corpora cavernosa, make these injuries particularly challenging to manage due to the potential for complications like infection, erectile dysfunction, and urethral strictures. Conclusion: Penile GSWs present a unique challenge due to the functional and anatomical complexity of the organ. A multidisciplinary approach and individualized management plans are key in managing such injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.