ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026
Rare case of osteochondroma in the spinous process of the fifth cervical vertebra in a pediatric patient with multiple hereditary exostoses.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Spinal osteochondromas develop from aberrant endochondral ossification of the vertebrae, which originate from the sclerotome of the paraxial mesoderm. These tumors typically involve the posterior elements, such as the spinous process, lamina, or pedicles. Spinal osteochondromas are rare, constituting less than 2% of all osteochondromas and under 4% of spinal tumors. Presentation of case: A 7-year-old boy came to the clinic with a lump at the back of the neck and difficulty moving his head, which was diagnosed as osteochondroma at the fifth cervical vertebra (C5). The child also had a history of multiple hereditary exostoses affecting other parts of the body. Discussion: Spinal osteochondromas account for a small percentage of cases, with the cervical spine being the most frequently affected. Diagnosis relies on computed tomography for precise visualization, aiding in preoperative planning. The etiology involves genetic mutations in EXT1 and EXT2, with additional mechanical factors possibly contributing to cervical spine involvement. This case contributes valuable insights into pediatric spinal osteochondromas, underscoring the need for timely diagnosis to prevent complications. Conclusion: Osteochondromas are considered the most common benign tumors. However, spinal osteochondromas are very rare, particularly in pediatric patients. This case underscores the importance of recognizing osteochondroma as a differential diagnosis for neck masses in children. Early diagnosis and surgical intervention can prevent complications and recurrence, highlighting the clinical significance of this rare condition. This report also emphasizes the necessity of vigilant postoperative follow-up to ensure complete recovery and monitor for potential complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.