ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026
Fatal complication from Foley's catheter: a case report.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: Foley's catheterization is a common and routinely performed procedure, yet it carries risks including urinary tract infection, urethral trauma, and, more rarely, bladder perforation. Reports of simultaneous bladder and bowel injury during catheter exchange are exceedingly uncommon. Case presentation: We report an 86-year-old woman with hypertension, heart failure, and a history of uterine cancer treated with chemotherapy and pelvic radiotherapy 2 decades earlier. After a routine Foley's catheter exchange, she developed paraumbilical pain and decreased urine output. She was hemodynamically stable on arrival to the emergency department, but imaging revealed a catheter-associated perforated viscus. Emergency laparotomy identified both bladder and jejunal perforations. The bladder was repaired, and the affected small bowel was resected followed by a primary anastomosis. Initially, her postoperative course was uneventful, but she developed septic shock on day 3, resulting in her death. Clinical discussion: Complications from Foley's catheter placement are rare when appropriate indications and insertion techniques are followed. The combination of bladder and bowel injury without a preexisting fistulous tract is scarcely documented in the literature. This case highlights a potentially underrecognized risk in patients with multiple risk factors such as prior radiation. Conclusion: Although simultaneous bladder and bowel injury during Foley's catheter exchange is exceptionally rare, careful patient assessment, proper insertion technique, and increasing knowledge about its indication may reduce morbidity. Increased clinician awareness of this complication may improve early recognition and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.