ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026
Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis: a three-case series highlighting diagnostic challenges and surgical managements.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) is a rare and heterogeneous fibro-inflammatory disorder of the peritoneum characterized by progressive formation of a dense fibrocollagenous membrane that envelopes and constricts the small bowel. Its protean clinical manifestations frequently overlap with other causes of intestinal obstruction, making timely diagnosis a persistent clinical challenge. Case Presentations: We report three cases of idiopathic EPS presenting with varying degrees of bowel obstruction and radiologic features initially suggestive of internal herniation, adhesive small-bowel obstruction, and intermittent closed-loop obstruction. All patients demonstrated dense adhesions or fibrous encapsulation intraoperatively, despite the absence of traditional risk factors such as peritoneal dialysis (PD) or abdominal tuberculosis (TB). CT findings aided early suspicion but lacked sufficient specificity to establish a preoperative diagnosis, underscoring the indispensable role of surgical exploration. Each patient underwent laparotomy with adhesiolysis and decapsulation, tailored to the extent of disease, with favorable postoperative outcomes. Conclusion: These cases illustrate the diagnostic complexity of EPS and reinforce that operative intervention remains the definitive means of both confirming the diagnosis and restoring bowel function once fixed obstruction or encapsulation has developed. Our series emphasizes the importance of maintaining EPS in the differential diagnosis of unexplained small-bowel obstruction, even in the absence of conventional predisposing conditions, and highlights the need for heightened clinical vigilance to prevent delays in management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.