ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2026
T-tube insertion as a salvage procedure for failed primary repair in penetrating esophageal injury complicated by sepsis: a case report from low resource setting.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: Esophageal perforation is a life-threatening emergency associated with high morbidity and mortality. Case presentation: A 28-year-old female presented with a cervical esophageal stab injury. An initial primary repair failed, and the patient developed severe sepsis. Surgical re-exploration revealed two esophageal perforations. The lateral perforation was repaired, and a T-tube was inserted through the anterior defect to create a controlled fistula. A feeding jejunostomy was also performed. The patient recovered fully following 9 weeks of T-tube drainage and enteral feeding. Clinical discussion: Cervical esophageal perforations present unique management challenges due to their proximity to vital structures and the high risk of mediastinal sepsis. Primary repair is preferred when feasible; however, failure can result in uncontrolled leakage and infection. In such cases, T-tube drainage provides a controlled fistula that allows decompression, sepsis control, and spontaneous closure once healing occurs. Compared to advanced techniques such as endoscopic stenting or vacuum-assisted closure, T-tube diversion is simple, inexpensive, and suitable for resource-limited environments. Adequate drainage, nutritional support through feeding jejunostomy, and close follow-up are critical to achieving favourable outcomes. Conclusion: T-tube drainage is a valuable salvage option in the management of complicated oesophageal perforations in resource-limited settings and nutritional support through feeding jejunostomy are key to optimizing outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.