Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41938347›Full record

ReviewNatural hazards (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2026

Hybrid methods in flood inundation modeling: a systematic review.

Manimeldura Devki Devanga Perera, Athanasios Angeloudis, Adil Siripatana, Lindsay Beevers

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Natural hazards (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Manimeldura Devki Devanga PereraInstitute for Infrastructure and Environment (IIE), School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9YL UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7006-5465
Athanasios AngeloudisInstitute for Infrastructure and Environment (IIE), School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9YL UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5021-3643
Adil SiripatanaInstitute for Infrastructure and Environment (IIE), School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9YL UK.ORCID 0009-0001-5755-2653
Lindsay BeeversInstitute for Infrastructure and Environment (IIE), School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9YL UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1597-273X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flooding is a destructive natural hazard that is exacerbating due to climate change, causing significant socio-economic losses. Flood inundation models are critical tools in the mitigation and management of such hazards. Conventional standalone process-based models can be limited in real-time applications due to their computational intensity and the trade-off between accuracy, resolution and speed. Data-driven (machine learning) models offer an alternative route as surrogate models, promising computational efficiency, however, are noted to have limitations of high data-dependency and a black-box nature. Hybridization, implemented in machine learning models to enhance strengths and limit tradeoffs has been shown to increase physics awareness, real-time applicability, and adaptability. This paper conducts a systematic review of state-of-the-art research on hybrid flood models, and presents a definition of hybridization. A classification of hybridization techniques into enhancing inputs, structure and processing is proposed. Sequentially, common metrics used to evaluate flood models are classified into accuracy and speed-based metrics, and the usefulness of hybridization is discussed. An extensive benchmarking framework is proposed for the comparison of models before application, based on quantitative classification of the model and standardized datasets and tests. Finally, a way forward is proposed in the context of physics informed machine learning for flood inundation modeling. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11069-026-08078-w.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingData-drivenEvaluation metricsFlood inundationHybrid models

Identifiers

PMID41938347
PMCPMC13046610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.