ReviewNatural hazards (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2026
Hybrid methods in flood inundation modeling: a systematic review.
Review in Natural hazards (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Flooding is a destructive natural hazard that is exacerbating due to climate change, causing significant socio-economic losses. Flood inundation models are critical tools in the mitigation and management of such hazards. Conventional standalone process-based models can be limited in real-time applications due to their computational intensity and the trade-off between accuracy, resolution and speed. Data-driven (machine learning) models offer an alternative route as surrogate models, promising computational efficiency, however, are noted to have limitations of high data-dependency and a black-box nature. Hybridization, implemented in machine learning models to enhance strengths and limit tradeoffs has been shown to increase physics awareness, real-time applicability, and adaptability. This paper conducts a systematic review of state-of-the-art research on hybrid flood models, and presents a definition of hybridization. A classification of hybridization techniques into enhancing inputs, structure and processing is proposed. Sequentially, common metrics used to evaluate flood models are classified into accuracy and speed-based metrics, and the usefulness of hybridization is discussed. An extensive benchmarking framework is proposed for the comparison of models before application, based on quantitative classification of the model and standardized datasets and tests. Finally, a way forward is proposed in the context of physics informed machine learning for flood inundation modeling. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11069-026-08078-w.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.