ReviewFrontiers in medical technology2026
Dental devices and antimicrobial resistance: challenges, innovations, and regulatory compliances.
Review in Frontiers in medical technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antibacterial performance of biomimetic hydroxyapatite-functionalized titanium surfaces againstFrontiers in oral health · 2026Article
- Advances in antibiofilm strategies for medical implant-associated infections: emerging technologies and translational challenges.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Oral dysbiosis: methodological evolution, the mobile resistome and the future of machine learning in dentistry.Journal of oral microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an escalating threat to infection control in dentistry, where dense multispecies biofilms and frequent device-tissue contact can select for and disseminate antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs). The oral cavity functions as a reservoir and exchange network for ARGs (the oral resistome), enabling multidrug-resistant (MDR) infections and treatment failure, particularly on dental implants, restorative materials, and dental unit waterlines when reprocessing or maintenance is inadequate. Anti-biofilm surface engineering, including antimicrobial peptide-functionalized coatings, silver-based nanostructures, and nitric oxide-releasing platforms, offers non-antibiotic approaches to reduce adhesion and disrupt early biofilm development. However, translation requires addressing durability, long-term biocompatibility and toxicology (e.g., ion release), the potential for resistance or tolerance under sublethal exposure, and clinically meaningful validation in relevant multispecies models and human studies. Regulatory expectations (e.g., FDA quality system requirements under 21 CFR Part 820 and international standards ISO 13485, ISO 14971, and ISO 10993-1) frame risk management, antimicrobial performance claims, sterilization/reprocessing validation, and postmarket surveillance. Aligning antimicrobial stewardship with validated device design, sterilization, and monitoring strategies is essential to mitigate AMR proliferation and improve long-term clinical outcomes. This article is a comprehensive narrative review focusing on AMR in dental devices, materials innovation, and regulatory frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.