Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41938343›Full record

ReviewGlobal medical genetics2026

Molecular genetic diagnosis of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease - A systematic review.

Natalie Ciantar, Edith Said

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global medical genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Natalie CiantarDepartment of Anatomy, Centre for Molecular Medicine & Biobanking, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Malta.
Edith SaidDepartment of Anatomy, Centre for Molecular Medicine & Biobanking, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Malta.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is a genetically heterogeneous disorder primarily caused by pathogenic variants in Method: Following a predefined protocol and PRISMA 2020 guidelines, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for studies published between January 2015 and August 2025. Eligible studies included ≥ 30 clinically diagnosed ADPKD participants and reported patient-level diagnostic data. Two investigators independently extracted information on testing methods, diagnostic yield, and identified genes. Results: From 23,718 records, 20 studies met inclusion criteria, with sample sizes ranging from 32 to 634 participants. Diagnostic methods included Sanger sequencing (SS), multiplex ligand-probe amplification (MLPA), long-range PCR (LR-PCR), targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels, whole-exome sequencing (WES), and whole-genome sequencing (WGS). Detection rates ranged from 61% (LR-PCR) to 92% (targeted NGS). Conclusion: Targeted NGS panels provided the highest diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness for ADPKD. Complementary use of MLPA and LR-PCR improved detection of complex variants. Further optimization of sequencing workflows and variant interpretation will enhance diagnostic precision and clinical application. This review provides an evidence-based foundation for current diagnostic practices in ADPKD.

Indexed as

ADPKDAutosomal dominantGenotypingPKD1PKD2Polycystic kidney

Identifiers

PMID41938343
PMCPMC13050056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.