ArticleJournal of pain research2026
Data Mining of Acupuncture Prescriptions for Lateral Epicondylitis: A Literature-Based Analysis of Acupoint Patterns and Parameters.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lateral epicondylitis (LE) is a prevalent musculoskeletal disorder characterized by pain and functional limitations of the elbow. Acupuncture is increasingly employed as an adjunctive therapy for LE, owing to its potential to alleviate symptoms. Significant heterogeneity persists in clinical acupuncture protocols, and the optimal selection of acupoints remains inadequately defined, thereby limiting the generalizability and standardization of treatment approaches. Objective: This study seeks to identify and synthesize the most frequently used and effective acupoint combinations for LE treatment through the application of data mining techniques to analyze existing clinical literature. Methods: Eight electronic databases were searched for studies on acupuncture treatments for LE published from January 2015 to March 2025. Randomized controlled trials and clinical controlled trials that reported acupuncture prescriptions for LE were included. Reviews, meta-analyses, protocols, animal experiments, guidelines, and case reports were excluded. Literature screening and data extraction were performed based on predefined criteria. Microsoft Excel 2019 was used for descriptive statistical analysis. Association rule analysis was performed using R Version 4.5.0. A visual association network of acupoints was generated using Cytoscape 3.10.1. OriginPro2024 was used for clustering and correlation analyses of acupoints. Results: Forty-two articles were included according to the established criteria. Regarding treatment parameters, the most frequently used needle type was 0.30 mm × 40 mm, and a 30-minute retention time was predominant. The most common treatment frequency was 7 days per week, with total duration most commonly being 20 days. Regarding acupoint selection, the most frequently used acupoints were Ashi point, Quchi (LI11), Shousanli (LI10), Hegu (LI4) and Waiguan (TE5). The Large Intestine Meridian of Hand Yangming was the most frequently used meridian. Among specific point categories, five-shu points were the most frequently employed. The frequency of acupoints used was highest in the elbow. The association analysis showed the most supported acupoint pair was LI11 and LI10. Core acupoints identified for LE treatment included Ashi point, LI4, LI11, LI10 and TE5. By hierarchical cluster analysis, the acupuncture points were categorized into four categories. Conclusion: This review identified 0.30 mm × 40 mm needles, 30‑minute retention, 7 sessions weekly, and 20 days total duration as the predominant treatment parameters for lateral epicondylitis. The core acupoints included Ashi, LI11, LI10, LI4, and TE5. Notably, the combination of LI11 and LI10 constituted the most significant association rule. The Large Intestine Meridian and five‑shu points were most frequently used, and acupoint distribution was highest in the elbow. These findings provide evidence-based support for clinical acupuncture decision-making, yet further prospective trials are needed to confirm the validity of these patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.