Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41938207›Full record

ReviewEvolution letters2026

AI solutions for evolutionary genomics of nonmodel species.

Michael DeGiorgio, Sandipan Paul Arnab, Matteo Fumagalli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evolution letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael DeGiorgioDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4908-7234
Sandipan Paul ArnabDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, United States.
Matteo FumagalliSchool of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4084-2953

Funding

Identifying complex modes of adaptation from population-genomic dataR35GM128590 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI Michael DeGiorgio · 2018 to 2026
$2.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128590
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As large-scale genomic datasets are becoming abundant, new questions can now be posed in evolutionary biology. Although innovative methodological approaches are constantly developed to test these new hypotheses, their application to the study of nonmodel species is hampered by technical challenges associated with such systems. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) solutions, mostly in the form of deep neural networks, have been successfully introduced to analyse genomic data from nonmodel species. Here, we highlight the latest trends in deep learning to infer demographic history and signals of natural selection, and offer novel research directions to develop AI algorithms for the study of nonmodel organisms. Specifically, we identify strategies to process data missingness and uncertainty, to infer selective events in the face of unknown genomic and demographic parameters, and to generate interpretable and explainable predictions. We demonstrate our arguments by showcasing an original implementation to detect selective sweeps from an experimental setting with low sample size, uncertain sequencing data, and unknown demographic model, as typical in studies of nonmodel species. We argue that the study of nonmodel organisms is an opportunity to develop general-purpose data-driven methodologies for evolutionary inferences. Fair sharing of resources and inclusive frameworks are key to enabling researchers to benefit the most from this new wave of technologies.

Indexed as

adaptationevolutionary genomicspopulation geneticspositive selection

Identifiers

PMID41938207
PMCPMC13043892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.