ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2026
The Effect of Electrical Stimulation on Median Nerve Recovery After Repair in Rats.
Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Studies have shown that electrical stimulation (ES) accelerates peripheral nerve recovery after repair. Electrical stimulation of 10 minutes or less improved functional and histological recovery in a murine model of sciatic nerve transection and repair. The primary purpose of our study was to determine if less than 10 minutes of ES can accelerate recovery in rats after median nerve transection and repair. Methods: Twenty-eight male Sprague Dawley rats underwent transection and primary repair of the median nerve proximal to the elbow. Rats were randomized into four groups: three groups received ES of 1, 5, or 10 minutes after nerve repair and one group received no ES. Grip strength was tested for 8 weeks, using previously described methods. These data were compared to a control group of rats with intact median nerves and no ES from our pilot study. After 8 weeks, rats were killed, and the bilateral flexor digitorum superficialis muscles and median nerves were harvested. The axon area proximal and distal to the nerve repair was measured histologically. Results: There was no significant difference in grip strength between the groups that received no ES versus ES of any duration. Axon area was lower distal to the repair site in the control rats without ES. We did not observe a difference in axon area distal to the nerve repair in the treatment groups. Conclusions: ES did not accelerate functional or histological healing of the median nerve after primary repair in rats. Level of evidence: 2B.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.