Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41938200›Full record

ArticleJournal of hand surgery global online2026

The Effect of Electrical Stimulation on Median Nerve Recovery After Repair in Rats.

Lauren E Piana, Jonathan Ge, Elliott Rebello, Joseph Cusano, Michael Shipp, Janine Molino, Julia A Katarincic, Joseph A Gil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hand surgery global online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lauren E PianaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
Jonathan GeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
Elliott RebelloDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
Joseph CusanoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
Michael ShippDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
Janine MolinoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
Julia A KatarincicDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
Joseph A GilDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Studies have shown that electrical stimulation (ES) accelerates peripheral nerve recovery after repair. Electrical stimulation of 10 minutes or less improved functional and histological recovery in a murine model of sciatic nerve transection and repair. The primary purpose of our study was to determine if less than 10 minutes of ES can accelerate recovery in rats after median nerve transection and repair. Methods: Twenty-eight male Sprague Dawley rats underwent transection and primary repair of the median nerve proximal to the elbow. Rats were randomized into four groups: three groups received ES of 1, 5, or 10 minutes after nerve repair and one group received no ES. Grip strength was tested for 8 weeks, using previously described methods. These data were compared to a control group of rats with intact median nerves and no ES from our pilot study. After 8 weeks, rats were killed, and the bilateral flexor digitorum superficialis muscles and median nerves were harvested. The axon area proximal and distal to the nerve repair was measured histologically. Results: There was no significant difference in grip strength between the groups that received no ES versus ES of any duration. Axon area was lower distal to the repair site in the control rats without ES. We did not observe a difference in axon area distal to the nerve repair in the treatment groups. Conclusions: ES did not accelerate functional or histological healing of the median nerve after primary repair in rats. Level of evidence: 2B.

Indexed as

Electrical stimulationGrip strengthMedian nerveNerveRats

Identifiers

PMID41938200
PMCPMC13049636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.