Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41938194›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied statistics2026

Optimal design for matched pair cluster randomized trials with heterogeneous correlations and costs.

Arpan Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied statistics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Arpan SinghDepartment of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, Hyderabad, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8141-5782

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conducting studies using cluster randomized trials (CRTs) is often a costly endeavor. When budget constraints are present, it becomes crucial to design CRTs optimally under the given cost limitations. A matched pair CRT, is a trial in which clusters are paired based on similar baseline characteristics, and one cluster from each pair is randomly assigned to the intervention while the other serves as control. Commonly, CRT designs assume equal intra-class correlation and sampling costs across clusters, but this assumption is rarely met in practice due to various factors. This article proposes optimal subject allocations within clusters for matched pair CRTs. The allocation is derived by minimizing the variance of treatment effect estimator under very general conditions, assuming heterogeneity in intra-class correlation, matching correlation, and sampling costs across clusters. The proposed design proves to be more efficient than the commonly used balanced design. To address the dependency on unknown parameters, min-max and pseudo-Bayesian optimal designs are also explored. Numerical examples based on real world data are provided to supplement the theoretical findings.

Indexed as

62P1097K80cost functionintra-class correlationMatched pair cluster randomized trialsmatching correlationoptimal design

Identifiers

PMID41938194
PMCPMC13045187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.