ArticleInternational journal of women's health2026
Prediction of Recurrence After Endometrial Polypectomy in Women of Childbearing Age Based on Machine Learning Algorithm.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Research on machine learning (ML) prediction models for recurrence after endometrial polypectomy remains unexplored. In this study, we aim to establish an ML-driven model based on multi-biomarkers to predict recurrence after endometrial polypectomy. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 606 patients who underwent endometrial polypectomy was analyzed. Variables including age, BMI, reproductive history, prior uterine surgery, coexisting uterine disorders, polyp characteristics, and routine blood indices were extracted. Seven ML algorithms (logistic regression, SVM, MLP, random forest, KNN, Naïve Bayes, and decision tree) were trained using 10-fold cross-validation. Performance was evaluated by AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and F1 score. Results: Of the 606 patients, 179 (29.5%) developed recurrence within one year postoperatively. The cohort was randomly divided into a training set (n = 424) and a validation set (n = 182). In the training set, the random forest (RF) algorithm achieved the best performance (AUC = 0.838, accuracy = 79.5%, specificity = 0.930, F1 score = 0.576). In the validation set, RF remained superior (AUC = 0.760, accuracy = 75.3%, specificity = 0.875, F1 score = 0.526), underscoring its strong generalizability. SHAP analysis identified age, posterior-wall polyp location, prior uterine surgery, histopathological subtype, and hemoglobin level as the most influential predictors of recurrence. Conclusion: The RF-based model, using demographic, clinical, and hematologic features, showed high accuracy in predicting recurrence risk after endometrial polypectomy. This interpretable ML framework can help clinicians identify high-risk patients early and personalize postoperative surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.