Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41938177›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of women's health2026

Discrimination, Stigma and Taboo Towards the Three Ms' Working Body: A Systematic Review Around Menstruation, Maternity and Menopause.

Matteo Cicchetti, Sara Viotti, Alberto Conforti, Lia Corrieri, Daniela Converso, Giulia Bacci, Gloria Guidetti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matteo CicchettiDepartment of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Sara ViottiDepartment of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Alberto ConfortiDepartment of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Lia CorrieriDepartment of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Daniela ConversoDepartment of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6780-4746
Giulia BacciDepartment of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Gloria GuidettiDepartment of Psychology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Menstruation, maternity and menopause are three natural and everyday experiences in most women's lives, but they often intersect in complex ways with career paths and workplace dynamics. In this study, the existing literature on these "three Ms" is systematically examined in relation to taboo, discrimination and stigma in work context, taking into account the PRISMA guidelines. A total of 84 articles from Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Science databases were analyzed. Most of the articles included refer to studies conducted in post-industrial, English-speaking countries, and only a few of them were conducted in non-post-industrial and low-income countries. The review is structured around the three key phases of the female reproductive life course: menstruation, maternity and menopause. These three Ms are examined using a tripartite framework: (1) the individual and subjective level, which focuses on personal experiences, identity, and psychological responses; (2) the organizational environment, which examines workplace policies, professional cultures, and institutional practices; and (3) attitudes and effects on well-being, including societal perceptions, stigma, and effects on psychological and overall health. This multi-level approach provides a comprehensive understanding of how these transitions are experienced, managed and interpreted both individually and in the socio-organizational environment. Despite the near parity in employment rates between men and women and the prevalence of the three Ms in post-industrial with high income countries, the literature is less extensive than expected, suggesting that there is limited academic engagement with the topic. The study highlights the reciprocal relationship between cultural beliefs and academic research. Increased academic attention to menstruation, maternity and menopause in relation to taboo, stigma and discrimination in the workplace could enhance public discourse and help improve the experiences of women at these life stages throughout their careers.

Indexed as

discriminationmaternitymenopausemenstruationorganizational policystigmasystematic reviewtaboowomen’s healthworkplace

Identifiers

PMID41938177
PMCPMC13050174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.