Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41938152›Full record

ArticleEndoscopic ultrasound

Long-term prognosis and risk factor-based surveillance strategy for patients with small gastric subepithelial lesion using endoscopic ultrasonography.

Jong Sun Park, Ji Hyun Park, Bumhee Park, Jong Hoon Park, Sun Gyo Lim, Sung Jae Shin, Kee Myung Lee, Sung Soo Ahn, Choong-Kyun Noh, Gil Ho Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jong Sun ParkDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Ji Hyun ParkOffice of Biostatistics, Medical Research Collaborating Center, Ajou Research Institute for Innovative Medicine, Ajou University Medical Center, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Bumhee ParkOffice of Biostatistics, Medical Research Collaborating Center, Ajou Research Institute for Innovative Medicine, Ajou University Medical Center, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Jong Hoon ParkDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Sun Gyo LimDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Sung Jae ShinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Kee Myung LeeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Sung Soo AhnSolve-it Rheumatology and Gastroenterology Clinic, Yongin, Republic of Korea.
Choong-Kyun NohSolve-it Rheumatology and Gastroenterology Clinic, Yongin, Republic of Korea.
Gil Ho LeeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Initial surveillance strategy and subsequent monitoring for small gastric subepithelial lesions (SELs) lack a consensus. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors and performance of predictive markers for lesions requiring surgical intervention in patients with small gastric SELs. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data of patients who underwent EUS at least twice between 2010 and 2023. Group S1 was defined as patients with a ≥20% increase in size from the initial EUS. The S1 was further divided into 2 groups according to requiring surgical intervention (S2 and S3). Results: Of the 476 patients, 106 (22.2%) had increase in size by ≥20% compared with the initial EUS (S1). The mean follow-up duration in the S1 was 70.2 months. Seven (1.5%) and 38 (8.0%) lesions were observed to have increased in size and were confirmed as gastrointestinal stromal tumors, respectively (S2). Lesions in the lesser curvature (odds ratio [OR]: 6.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.087-17.148, Conclusions: Although the size of the SELs increased, the classification for group S2 was very important. These results emphasize the necessity for effective follow-up strategies, including timely interventions, for small gastric SELs.

Indexed as

gastric subepithelial lesionGISTincreasing ratelesion sizesurveillance

Identifiers

PMID41938152
PMCPMC13048641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.