Comparison of postprocedural adverse events between same-day and separate-day combined EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with pancreatic mass and biliary obstruction: A retrospective cohort study.

Hong-Yuan Zou, Zheng-Dong Li, Jia-Hui Zhu, Zhen-Dong Jin, Zhuan Liao, Zhao-Shen Li, Yang-Yang Qian, Lei Wang

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hong-Yuan ZouDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Nautical Medicine and Translation of Drugs and Medical Devices, Changhai Hospital, National Key Laboratory of Immunity and Inflammation, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.

Zheng-Dong LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Nautical Medicine and Translation of Drugs and Medical Devices, Changhai Hospital, National Key Laboratory of Immunity and Inflammation, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.

Jia-Hui ZhuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.

Zhen-Dong JinDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Nautical Medicine and Translation of Drugs and Medical Devices, Changhai Hospital, National Key Laboratory of Immunity and Inflammation, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.

Zhuan LiaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Nautical Medicine and Translation of Drugs and Medical Devices, Changhai Hospital, National Key Laboratory of Immunity and Inflammation, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.

Zhao-Shen LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Nautical Medicine and Translation of Drugs and Medical Devices, Changhai Hospital, National Key Laboratory of Immunity and Inflammation, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.

Yang-Yang QianDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Nautical Medicine and Translation of Drugs and Medical Devices, Changhai Hospital, National Key Laboratory of Immunity and Inflammation, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.

Lei WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Nautical Medicine and Translation of Drugs and Medical Devices, Changhai Hospital, National Key Laboratory of Immunity and Inflammation, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: The optimal timing between endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy (EUS-FNA/B) remains undefined. This study compared The optimal timing between endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy (EUS-FNA/B) remains undefined. This study compared the safety and efficacy of same-day Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 362 patients with pancreatic mass and biliary obstruction who underwent EUS-FNA/B and ERCP during one hospitalization period at Changhai Hospital between January 2017 and February 2024. Outcomes included adverse events, technical success of biliary stenting, and diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA/B. Logistic regression identified risk factors for adverse events. Results: Patients were stratified into same-day (group A, Conclusion: Same-day ERCP and EUS-FNA/B is safe and feasible, does not increase adverse events, and reduces hospital stay.

Indexed as

biliary obstructionendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyEUSguided fineneedle aspiration/biopsypancreatic disease

Identifiers

PMID41938149

DOI10.1097/eus.0000000000000174

PMCPMC13048632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY-NC-ND

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.