ArticleEndoscopic ultrasound
Transesophageal EUS of mediastinal and pulmonary lesions: An Italian survey from i-EUS Working Group.
Article in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Pulmonary and mediastinal masses are diagnostic challenges for digestive endosonographers, and patients with these conditions are usually managed in thoracic or pulmonology units. EUS with tissue acquisition can result in adequate samples for histological examination and molecular analysis. Its spread among digestive endosonographers is limited; thus, we aimed to investigate the current management practices among the EUS Italian centers for those patients with mediastinal or pulmonary lesions to identify the principal areas of disagreement and help guide future research towards useful standardization. Methods: A 44‑question survey was sent during a temporal trend of 3 months to the endosonographers in Italian centers performing EUS. The survey includes questions with either a single answer choice or with multiple options exploring different aspects of the EUS done for the evaluation of thoracic lesions. The questions were grouped into specific sections: expertise of the center, periprocedural management, procedural aspects, and future perspectives. Results: Thirty-nine centers completed the survey, 27 (69.2%) from the north of Italy. Only 2 centers among the responders did not perform any mediastinal EUS (5.13%). The majority of centers (22, 59.5%) performed between 0 and 30 mediastinal EUS yearly, and only 3 centers did more than 100 mediastinal EUS per year. Responders were mainly gastroenterologists (34, 87.2%) Conclusions: This is the first survey assessing an evaluation on mediastinal/pulmonary EUS, which is well represented in Italy. Nonetheless, centers largely have low volumes of these procedures. Our results show heterogeneity in the management of patients affected with mediastinal/pulmonary lesions needing tissue acquisition. More studies also involving pulmonologists, thoracic surgeons, and oncologists are needed to increase data and understanding regarding this procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.